Commencement of CIRP does not cease the jurisdiction to investigate under the PMLA 2002: The High Court of Delhi rules

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (Court) in its judgment in the matter of Mr. Talib Hassan Darvesh v. The Directorate of Enforcement, held that the summons issued by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) cannot be quashed merely because the relevant documents required for purposes of investigation or confrontation to the petitioner, have not been…

NCLT has the jurisdiction to direct ED to release attached properties after a resolution plan that qualifies for immunity under section 32A of the IBC is approved: High Court of Bombay clarifies

In the matter of Shiv Charan and Ors. v. Adjudicating Authority and Anr., a division bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court assessed the legality of continuing an attachment levied on the properties of the Corporate Debtor under the provisions of the, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) in the teeth of the provisions…

Supreme Court Rules Directors Can Be Held Liable Despite Moratorium in IBC Proceedings

The hon’ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a significant ruling in the matter Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association (Regd.) v. Ansal Crown Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd. (ACIPL) & Ors. addressing the complex interplay between insolvency proceedings and consumer complaints and affirmed that directors and officers of a company can still be held accountable…